United Nations (UN) published in October 2024. They show that only 13 of the world’s countries have women in the forehead, which, as Sky News, raises the question of whether the world would be calmer if more than one woman would be in power.
Some prominent leaders, such as former American President Barak Obama, believe that the world would be calmer if more than one woman would be in power.
He said earlier that in that case there would be less war, the children would be better taken care of, and living standards would also be better.
These claims also support the former president of Ireland, Mary Robinson, who believes that a larger number of women at the top of the government would be “necessary” to achieve a quieter world.
However, the view of history shows that women at the head of the state were not necessarily inclined to avoid conflict.
Professor of Political Sciences at Prinston University, Christopher Blair points out that women in a high position often act as “steel ladies” to overcome gender stereotypes that show them as less competent in national security issues.
The first Prime Minister of Great Britain, Margaret Tacher, started Folkland War in 1982. year, while Hillary Clinton, as an American state secretaire, hesitated in terms of peace with Taliban, because she was not considered “treasures.”
Angela Saine, author of the book “Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule”, is not immune to aggression, “Prime Minister India, which was introduced by the state of emergency, which was led by the Indian Ukranj against the British in 1857. Years.
Psychologist Kordelija Fajn points out that the role of women in decision-making can contribute to the reduction of wars, which can be seen in research that show that women’s peacekeeping participation leads to lasting solutions.
Although women can be more prone to avoiding war, social and political context can affect their response, and the inclusion of women in decision-making processes certainly contributes to a peaceful society.
(Vijesti.ba)
