This subject, conducted before the Cantonal Court in Sarajevo, was one of the most controversial objects kept in front of BH. the judiciary.
Namely, in separated actions, Brkić was sentenced to four years and eleven months in prison for the briother of the Judge Azri Miletić, while Judge Miletić is finalized to receive a bribe of Ram Brkić, reminding investigation.
The indictment against Brkić was filed by the Prosecution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the State Court in 2019. issued a decision to transfer the proceedings against it to the local competent municipal court in Sarajevo.
Rania Judgment of the Court of BiH, Brkić was sentenced to a single prison sentence of ages due to organized crime, drug traffic, receiving gifts and other forms of position, and in the same case, Senad Šabić was convicted with him.
Both Brkić and Sabic were later accused of the Judge State Court Azra Miletić, by the indictment to offered a gift from the intermediary to reduce the punishment in the appeal procedure that was then guided.
Both of them then left the territory of BiH, and the procedure was separated and driven only against the Judge Miletić, which was finalized, while Brkić, after extradition from Slovenia – was convicted.
“In this case before the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a unique criminal proceedings against the appellant and S. Š. Due to the criminal offense of Giving and others were originally led
The form of benefits, and against AM due to the criminal offense of receiving gifts and violations of the law by the judge. After that, the criminal proceedings against the appellant and S. Š. Compared to the accused AM, the appellant was sentenced by the Judgment of the Cantonal Court in Sarajevo by the Judgment of the Cantonal Court in Sarajevo, convicted that he committed the criminal offense of giving gifts and other forms of benefit. In his decision, the Constitution pointed out that the Cantonal Court in circumstances in the circumstances of the Cantonal Court undertake to take into account the newly formed surroundings – the decision-making legal issue that was associated with the determination of the appellant’s criminal responsibility and the existence of the Corrupt Federation – Agreement between the appellant, S. Š. I am the said displacement of the Cantonal Court related to ignoring a specific, relevant and important question that depends on the existence of the appellant was charged in the lack of adequate explanation of the court decision in the specific circumstances of the specific object. Therefore, the Constitutional Court adopted the appellation and concluded that in the circumstances of the specific case, the Court’s right to a fair trial was violated in relation to the reasoned court decision, “the BiH Constitutional Court announced.
(Vijesti.ba)
