The defense of the members of the Association “Panteri” Ahmeda Ginović, Semira Berhamović, presented the reasons before the Municipal Court in Sarajevo, which he believes that he should not end in custody that the Prosecution KS after they were detained during the weekend.
Goran Dragović, defense counsel, opposed to determining the detention of his manman, as he already serves a sentence in the Bihać Penitentiary.
He rejected the prosecution allegations that his client participated in any criminal actions that the Prosecution puts him at a burden.
“The Prosecution is supplied with the public that is rightly dissatisfied with the work of institutions,” he said.
He stated that his client could not have any influence on the investigation “because he did not have an impact in Bihać prison nor to contact him”.
He said that his braid crimes in the damage of juveniles “repeatedly reported” to the Prosecutor’s Offices and the police in Una-Sana Canton, but that nothing was taken and that therefore does not want to submit shots now.
His Branden Džinovic said that as the KS prosecutor’s Office said he wanted to cooperate, but that he wanted to get immunity before.
“I’m struggling for the community as much as I can. My family and I have a company I make money, I don’t do this for money. I presented me as if I was a criminal face,” he said.
Since Berhamović was on the run, today’s hearing was attended by his client who said that his client was not familiar with what he was charged.
As he said, his relationships with Bosnia and Herzegovina are indisputable because his family was there, he was just her citizen and that there is no reason for the escape.
He brought into question the credibility of the witness in this case is asked why she had not previously reported any criminal offenses. Also, as a mitigating circumstance for his client, he stated that he was uncomfortable.
Sultanović’s lawyer Dijana Hasić Kamaric said that the Prosecution in the proposal for custody was general conclusions.
She was asked why custody was asked for her client who were charged with two actions in the expense, while only the prohibition measures are asked for “although they have five, six, seven, eight or nine actions of execution.” She said all the suspects must be treated in the same way.
Although her client was convicted several times, she said that the last criminal offense was recorded seven years ago.
She added that the entire proposal for custody is based on assumptions, that the suspect would influence witnesses, conceal evidence, etc.
The right to the word used the Sultanović itself, who had a defense defended by Djinović, who was the guy of his daughter during the attempted his defense Clix.
“That Ahmeda is not, many guys who have taken the largest drug addicted today. I was telling him to pay him. I was now serving him, and he had returned to me. Alcoholic, “he said.
