The first man of the Judicial Organization, Bertrand Layec, published an analysis of situations from the 8th. Kola SuperSport Croatian football league.
This analysis was published by HNS, and we transfer the communication in full.
Situation no. 1: Varaždin – Vukovar 1991 (20 minutes); penalty blow (posture)
During the angle strike, while the ball was in the game and entered penaltyDefender guest team no. 25 Unfolded used both hands to keep the attacker. Although the posture takes place during the summer of the ball, the abyss of posture was intended and meets our technical considerations:
– Use both hands around the attacker
– Especially long holding.
VAR recommended the judge correctly an overview of the situation to potentially award a criminal impact.
After reviewing the record, the judge was correctly awarded a penalty blow and warned the defender no. 25 Due to holding the rival player.
Situation no. 2: Hajduk – Locomotive (18 minutes); hinterland
During the attack of the home team, the ball was added to the domestic attacker no. 10. This player gave the ball into the rival Refrigerator where his teammate no. 9 scored a hit. In accordance with VAR protocol, Var was obliged to check all the attack phases (potential hinterland).
Review of shots from VAR Rooms It was found that VAR Judge asked the technician to deliver a video of both situations from which it was visible that No punishable hijackers. Unfortunately, during the match was published Only the situation scored by the hit with drawn draws. The subsequent triangulation analysis proves that in the first situation of the foot and shoulder of the guest defender no. 3 Whether in a line with the foot of the attacker initiated the addition to the penalty spacing, which means that there was no hinterland.
It was wrong Do not publish this triangulation And Var was supposed to insist that the technician (operator) publish this situation during the match. In conclusion, we can say that Hajduk’s hit preceded the punishable hinterland.
From this, the conclusion is that the hit is properly recognized.
Situation no. 3: Gorica – Osijek (77 minutes); Another warning (simulating)
After being in 66. Minute player no. 50 domestic teams Show first yellow card Due to the objection, his judge in 77. Minute showed another yellow card Due to unsportsmanlike conduct – Simulations.
During a duel in the off-mind, the visiting team, when player no. 50 home teams touched lightly from the back, excessively emphasized the contact and threw. The judge, who was properly positioned, showed a clear body speech that it was not a misdemeanor for a criminal kick, awarded the indirect free kick and the offender showed another yellow card for simulation and turned it off.
We support this disciplinary penalty and condemn such unsportsmanlike behavior, it is announced.
(www.jabuka.tv)
