Request, signed by deputies Sheriff Spago, Edin Ramic, Safet Kešo, Midhat Causevic, Nermin Mandra, Dennial Tulumovic, Amor Masovic, Šemsudin Dedic, Milan Dunovic, Vlatko Glavas and Golden Begicwe are transferred in full:
Dear President Stevandic,
The National Assembly of the Republika Srpska is on its twentieth special session on 13.03.2025. The year adopted a decision to determine the draft of the Constitution of Republika Srpska (further: the decision), with an accepted conclusion on the design of the Draft of the Republika Srpska to a public hearing that will be implemented within 30 days. ‘ An integral part of this decision is the Draft Constitution of the Republika Srpska.
Not entering this opportunity in extremely negative political connotations and the crisis that has caused the Constitution of Republika Srpska, which is an integral partitioning in its entirety, which is a serious violation of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and binding international law for Bosnia and Herzegovina. You are aware that in public debate referred and requests support for the adoption of the unconstitutional proposal of the Republika Srpska, which, moreover, violates the binding and executive nature of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Namely, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina has discussed and decided on many issues that have been defined by this DECISION, in the context of this requirement, in the Constitutional Court of the Declaration of Constitutional Principles No. 02 / 1-021-1034 / 21 of 10.
“17. The National Assembly considers the current non-compliance of the competencies transferred to the level of BiH without the change of BiH’s Constitution as Annex 4. Dayton Agreement, should be overcome / resolved by the consistent application of the provision 3.3.b. The BiH Constitution stipulates that the entities will fully adhere to the BiH Constitution and the Government of the Republika Srpska, and the Board of BiH, and are not explicitly the BiH Constitution established as the authority of the BiH level.
The public is informed about that by the official Website of the National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska,
18. Confirming its previous constitutional relations documents, and in particular the protection of military neutrality from 18. October 2017. In October 2017 of the Republika Srpska from 12. November 2019, the conclusions of the National Assembly regarding the antiDeightystem of the Constitutional Court of BiH, from 13. February 2020., as well as the conclusions of the National Assembly regarding the application of Annex 10. March 2021. year, the National Assembly believes that it is necessary to approach the Constitution of Republika Srpska to the Advent on the Constitution of the Republika Srpska.
19. The National Assembly indebts to the Government of Republika Srpska to, in coordination with the President of the Republika Srpska, the text of the Constitution of the Republika Srpska will be confirmed by the Republic of Srpska, excluding the competencies that BiH belong to BiH. The new Constitution of the Republika Srpska, among other things, Banja Luka will be determined as the capital of Republika Srpska, and fell as the capital of the Republika Srpska.
20. O Procedures for the adoption of the new Constitution of the Republika Srpska, the National Assembly will decide the Government of the Republika Srpska. “The Constitutional Court has concluded that Article 1/2 and III / 3. B) the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and thus put them out of force.
However, ignoring such views of the Constitutional Court, Milorad Dodik President has proposed, and the National Assembly adopted a disputed decision, which makes them contrary to the provisions of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, but in this case contrary and the provisions of Article VI / 5. The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina according to which the decisions of this Court are final and binding.
We want to indicate that the protection of the legal system and the order of Bosnia and Herzegovina is the primary obligation of state institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. For the above reasons, as a legitimate representative and protector of the interest of the State of Bosnia and Herzegovina, we require the National Assembly of the Republika Srpska to take all legal measures in an urgent procedure and put out the remembrance decision. Otherwise, this dispute with Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is caused by the contradict action and violation of international standards, will have to be addressed in front of forced jurisdiction. This can still be prevented by acting on this requirement urgently, within a special session.
Finally, I think that this letter for a peaceful solution is slow and politically correct, because by placing the disputed decisions will relax the political situation in the country, as well as our relationship with the representatives of the international community.
I hope you can use your authority and legal powers in order to make a peaceful solution. You need to consider this request as a high priority act that deserves prompt treatment.
(Vijesti.ba)
