The fighter defeated Sarajevo 5: 1, while the railway with 2: 0 celebrated against Zrinjski. The matches, however, also marked disputed judicial decisions, especially annulled goals that caused turbulent reactions.
At 41. Minuti Borac – Sarajevo, the player of the visiting team No. 8 Handheld punishable contact with the ball, after which Sarajevo reached the goal for 2: 2. The main judge Sabrija Topalović, after the call from the var room, annulled the goal from playing by hand by Mlinarić.
The Committee for the Judges and the NS / FS BiH trial explained that the decision was justified. As they state, the attacking stage (App) did not interrupt when the defensive player played the ball because he had no control over her, he was under attacker’s pressure. Only controlled possession of the defense, where the player clearly controls the ball, interrupts the stage of the possessions.
The Committee also pointed out that the railway officer’s shot is justified against Zrinjski and Penal awarded HŠK Posušje against miners from Prijedor.
In the case of Željezničar – Zrinjski, Var room intervened due to a player who made an advantage that resulted in a goal. After inspecting the recording, the judge was correctly annulled the goal and awarded a direct free kick for a visiting team.
At the stifle – Rudar Prijedor, the Chief Judge was initially awarded the penalty, considering that the goalkeeper had contact with the attacker. After the VAR room intervention and the image view, it was found that there was no intention of the goalkeeper’s side and the contact was minimal, and the penalty was properly annulled and the ball was assigned to a goal.
The Committee for the Judges and NS / FS BiH trial is the sharpest condemning attempts to do the public to certain statements that are not in line with VAR protocol and manual.
With this statement, the Committee confirmed that all disputed decisions are in the 5th WWIN league Colon in accordance with the rules of the game and the procedures of VAR technology.
(Vijesti.ba)
