Sotrić refers to the provisions of Article 19. and 28. Statute of the City of Mostar and begs them to declare the status of real estate – the stadium under the white hill.
“According to the available data, the landlord is” Zrinjski “, and the owner of the state – to make sure that the real estate” Zrinjski “was described above, that the copy of the same provides in the attachment,” said.
Same with the ethrift for the Stadium Kantarevac. Although the landlord is entered by the City of Mostar, and the inscribed owner of the state, ask him to say – who is the actual user, ie when and on the basis of documentation, and to submit a copy of the documentation that is the basis for use by third parties.
“If the city of Mostar does not manage this space, please answer me – to make sure that in that case the city of Mostar generates revenues as a tenant and in which amount?”, According to the Sotrić.
The next request refers to the space of the earlier trade school.
“According to the publicly available enrollment, it is kept as a building-enrollment, the Croatian Democratic Union of BiH; as well as the authorities said, and if there is a documentation on the disposal, that the copies of the Sotrić is submitted.
The documentation is also required for a swimming pool.
“Please answer me – to make sure – whether the city’s” water supply and sewerage “is managed by the City Pool, as well as to which the City Pool, or the city of the City of Mostar or the City company has provided this property in favor of third entities.; And if there is documentation. available, to deliver a copy to me in the attachment “; Spot Sotrić.
The same is also required for the real estate “University of Mostar”, the previously owned by the University “Džemal Bijedić in Mostar”.
“I beg to answer me – to plead that, and tell me the documentation on the basis of which the University of Mostar has gained the right of ownership and / or possessions in these real estate,” said.
Sotrić further seeks documentation for the city spa.
“Although the City of Mostar is, I beg to respond to me – who has been the real beneficiaries, ie who has been on the above real estate, from when and on the basis of which documentation, and give me a copy of the documentation that was the basis for the use by third parties. If the city of Mostar has not managed this space in recent years, please answer me – to pleading – whether the city of Mostar has made revenues as a tenant and in which amount? “The letter is in the letter.
The next space is the former mechanical school (EMŠC).
“According to the publicly available information, this is the education building – the famous Municipal High School. Please provide the property above, that you have a copy of the same time, to give me a copy. Please answer – to plead – how this city is Property changed the title? “
Shotric states that the citizens of Mostar are witnessing the decades of public goods / public infrastructures in favor of third parties / entities, based on unjustified / illegal enracialness, and that in this context citizens, which have been financed by these facilities, from them no or very little benefit.
“On the contrary, public spaces that were available to us, especially the city stadium, the city pool, etc., are completely alienated from citizens and have become private ownership, although they were never allowed to be / or could be / become.
Given that it is obvious about great financial interests, the city authorities did not show enough transparency during the disposal of real estate that public property, ie the citizens are, when and on the basis of what is common (the Mostar Dictionaries said) KRMIO in favor of personal or other interests?
Here, especially responsibility, those bodies, who are obliged to preserve city property, but also the mayor of the city of Mostar, the city council and public attorney, all organs without whose acquisition or disposal of property. Regardless of the current personal solutions, all the heads of these bodies, both the previous mayors, the presidents of the city councils and the councilors, as well as public orders, manage this city in the last thirty years.
In accordance with European values, and in accordance with the commitment of huge majority of citizens towards the European path of Mostar and Bosnia and Herzegovina, it is high-time – that in line with these European values - citizens receive the questions in here. Here I respond responsibly, that neither privately, and especially in performing the honorary duty of the City Council of the City of Mostar, I have nothing against individual users above mentioned real estate, such as Eg. HŠK Zrinjski (from point 1 of this request), as much as the former PK “Velež”, and in the Heart of Handheld by the Congratulations of the Champions of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the 1924/25 season, and in the future I want top sports results, representing our city.
At the same time by taking the oath, I will consistently work as a councilor in the City Council of the City of Mostar, and that I will commit tasks in the purpose of developing the city of Mostar, HNK, I feel not only a moral obligation, but I will find our complain about the above mentioned seven questions, which are: The mayor of the city of Mostar, the President of the City Council of the City of Mostar and the Public Ombudsman of the City of Mostar Duty / Required – as soon as possible – ex officio to answer “.
(Vijesti.ba)
