The multitude of the Federal Auditor’s objections on the work of the Federal Ministry of Finance in 2024. years, on which the forehead is Kraljević (HDZ). Among the first objections is the incineration of the FBiH budget on time. It is stated that the Ministry did not submit to the Government of the Federation of BiH Draft Budget of the FBiH for 2024. year to 31.10. In accordance with the Law on Budgets in the FBiH, it has already been 22.02.2024. He submitted the Federal Government of the Proposal of the Budget by the urgent procedure adopted by the Government and forwarded to parliament.
Received two million KM each
Federal auditors processed a large detailed division of 50 million KM local communities. They drew attention to how it was defined by a public call “that the advantage would have projects that are the high degree of maturity” and that the mayors assessed the projects for which they are applying for themselves.
The FBiH budget was approved by 50 million KM municipalities and cities. Budget Execution Act for 2024. It was determined that money in this position will be used on the basis of decisions on determining the criteria and distribution of funds and cities brought by the FBiH Government.
These are projects travel, communal infrastructure …
The public call is defined that the advantage will have projects that are a “high degree” and priority for implementation in local self-government units and directly contribute to better quality of life. The maximum value of funding under this public invitation for all projects for the area of one unit of local self-government was up to 2,000,000 KM. In the event of a justified need, approvals and higher amounts are possible, which the FBiH Government shall be adopted.
In the public call, special criteria are defined, where it is emphasized that the evidence from special criteria is not mandatory, but the application of applications will be made based on them!?
Frontal projects from 2015
– The Ministry concludes the Cities and Municipalities Contracts for the Assistance from the FBiH Budget in August 2024. years. The sample includes seven municipalities and six cities that have been allocated to a total of 11,414,133 KM for co-financing 23 projects. The examination was reported in the submitted documentation that served as a basis for justifying the fulfillment of both general and special criteria.
The regulatory criteria related to the project-technical documentation in most cases were submitted to the main projects from 2015, 2018. And 2019. Years. Also, for a special criterion related to the maturity and expected results, individual applicants have submitted statements of the project maturity and the expected results of the procurement from public procurement portal, and are stated with the federal auditors and advertise:
– Please note that in this way, the chiefs assessed the projects for which they are applying for themselves. In addition, in sampled applications, certain projects were scored by 0 or five points for the same criterion, and the statements of the mayor to possess technical documentation and the implementation of the implementation of public procurement procedures have also submitted photos. Also, we are an example of the city of Bosanska Krupa, who submitted the head of the chief about the chief about the maturity of the project and photosocumentation, but one project is scored with a maximum of 25 points, and the other with five points.
The “Maturity of the Project” criteria have touched.
Non-transparency, possibility for subjective treatment
– From special criteria, we draw on the “maturity of the project” – the project phase and the expected results, which is not measurable and for which the exhibit documentation has not been clear. It is unclear how it is possible to assess the maturity of the project contained in the conceptual or main project, if the applicant is not obliged to the entire projects (in the sample of the main project, photodocumentation or pages with the Property Technical Documentation. Also, the public call is defined that “expected results” can be submitted in a separate statement or will be evaluated on the basis of statements from special criteria or from the data contained in the project documentation, the conceptual or main project, writes Factor.
Defined documentation confirming the fulfillment of special criteria indicates non-transparency and leaves room for possible subjective procedures during the review and assessment of certain projects – stands in the audit report.
