The Cantonal Court in Tuzla issued and publicly announced the first-instance verdict against the accused Nedim Hasanbegović (38) from Kladnje for committing a serious crime against public traffic safety, related to the traffic accident that occurred on July 13, 2025 near the intercity bus station in Tuzla, when Amar Sejdinović (22) from Banović was killed and several people were seriously injured.
We remind you that in the early morning hours of July 13, on the southern highway in Tuzla in Bosne srebrene Street, under the influence of alcohol and with the presence of narcotic drugs in his blood, aware that gross violations of traffic regulations can endanger public traffic and put people’s lives at risk, he drove a “BMW 530” vehicle in the right lane at a reckless speed of about 159 kilometers per hour, on a section where the speed limit is in a populated place of 50 km/h. When the driver of the “Golf 6” car turned on from the plateau of the gas station first to the left and then changed movement to the right lane at a speed of about 20-30 km/h, the BMW hit the front left side with the right side of the Golf, and the Golf was thrown, rotated and overturned.
Amar Sejdinović (22) from Banović, who was in the back seat of the ‘golf’, died as a result of his injuries, and six other people from both vehicles were seriously and lightly injured. A parked vehicle and a newsstand were also damaged as a result of the collision of the BMW.
The accused was sentenced to a security measure – a ban on driving a “B” category means of transport for a duration of 4 years, with the provision that the time spent in prison is not included in the duration of this measure.
The accused Haris Šehić was acquitted of having committed the criminal offense of Serious Criminal Offenses against the Safety of Public Traffic in connection with the criminal offense of Negligently Endangering Public Traffic.
After the verdict was pronounced, the court issued a decision extending the custody of the accused Nedim Hasanbegović, which can last for a maximum of nine months, counting from the day the verdict was pronounced. These decisions are not legally binding, because the parties have the right to appeal them.
(TYPE)
