Since many shops, supermarkets and granapi in the city were closed, the markets were almost the only places where citizens could be provided with basic groceries, and at the same time where they brought together, exchanging their survival experiences, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes, war recipes You buying not so cheap products.
Writes: dr. sc. Merisa Karović-BabicScientific Associate Institute for Real Review of Crimes against Humanity and International Law of the University of Sarajevo
Dana 5. February 1994, a few minutes after noon, from the direction of Mrković was fired that exploded on the asphalt surface within the Green Markala at the moment several hundred citizens were present at the market.
From the explosive and bursting of the grenade, according to the Clinical Center, the State Hospital and the Hospital of the French Battalion in Sarajevo, as well as burial companies in Sarajevo, a total of 67 killed and 139 wounded civilians were recorded, while the consequences in Hamburg, The death occurred for another person. (So, there were a total of 68 killed civilians).
What kind of missile is it?
In the investigation done immediately after the MUP’s members, the investigating judge of the Senior Court in Sarajevo, was established that it was a minobaccing projectile of the caliber of 120 mm, which was fired from the direction of “North-Northeast where the aggressor’s mrkovići is . Similarly confirmed the Commission of Experts formed by the Order of the High Court in Sarajevo, which made a special study, as well as later expertise prof. dr. Berka Zecevic for the ICTY Prosecutor’s Office.
SRK Commander, Stanislav Galić, in the internal order, sent to all units of SRK, “lately, individuals or servants art. The tools on the urban part of Sarajevo without the need that they have no effects “, which indirectly acknowledged that the Grenade on Markale fired the said members of the” SRK “.
However, in media appearances and communication with UNPROFOR, the leadership of the Self-Provided Republika Srpska claimed that “impossible for anyone from the Serbian army to fire a grenade without a clear order, because there are strict rules and weapons are closely monitored.” (Nikola Koljević, 2008, p. 424). In the same document, Galić warns his subordinates that Sarajevo is “the center of media-world attention, and is used for propaganda purposes,”, with a note that this order refers exclusively on the “urban part of the city not to the surrounding elevations (bile, mojmilo, sokolje) “. (AIZ, INV. # 1771, SRK command, Ikm 2 Butlies, p. No. 20/5-1413-97, 5. February 1994, submit to all SRK units, prohibitions in the urban part of Sarajevo, order. – Commander, Major General, Stanislav Galić).
Burning Reactions of Serbian Management
Directly after the massacre followed reatrage, primarily by Serbian and Serbian military and political leadership in terms of disclaimer, with the shameful insult of the victim’s dignifications and their families to be “textile and plastic dolls.”
The consensus on the manner of denial of the mentioned liability was not achieved, and several theses were placed in the public that was thrown away from a nearby building “, that the” grenade fired Croats “, thus trying to send the message The world public that everyone except Serbs are blamed for Markal Massacles. Thus, for example, the Chief of General Staff of the Yugoslav Army, at the 18th Session of the Supreme Defense Council of the FRY, from 7. February 1994 stated that they did “do it”, and “is not excluded that were done by Croats. ” General Perisic is sure that ” impossible for Serbs in Sarajevo to set it up, except for distance. ” Statement of “plastic limbs”, which Karadzic, immediately after The massacre tried to convince the world public that “imaginary victims” were also placed on the markings before the Trial before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
As a “argument” for this thesis, Radovan Karadzic offered a recording made immediately after the massacre, where a leg prosthesis can be spotted, which belonged to one of the victims of the massacre, Ćamila Begić.
As a Prosecution witness, the Process against Radovan Karadzic emerged from Camilo Begić, which explained in detail the circumstances of his father’s death, with all relevant documentation confirmed by the specified case. (ICTY, IT-95-5 / 18: Karadzic, Witness: Almir Begić, Cross Examination by MR. And 16. December 2010; ICTY, Prosecution v. Karadzic, IT-95-5 / 18-T, para. 4230). After all material evidence related to the “controversial” leg in the leg, the Council characterized Karadzic’s publicly expressed claims as “completely unconvincing and inappropriate. (…) bizarre and morbid. ” (ICTY, Prosecution v. Karadzic, IT-95-5 / 18-T, para. 4198, 4230).
Court in The Hague: Grenades Fasting from the Territory under SRK control
This as well as mass crimes in a few other sites in the city were the subject of very detailed analyzes before the Hague Tribunal, after presenting evidence and prosecution and defense, as well as the testimony of witnesses and prosecutors and defense in Galić, Karadzic. , Mladic, found that the grenades were fired from the territory under control of SRK.
Four days after the shelling of the market, in response to the threats by the Bombing of the VRS position by the SRK, Stanislav Galić, based on the previous command of GS VRS, ordered all the SRK units to serve “blackmailers and Pressures in order to suspend air strikes, “and if there are UNPROFOR power and all foreign humanitarian organizations that were at the territory of RS, should” attack (not kill), capture and hold as hostages, until NATO interrupts aircresses in the field, as well as taking United Nations Office, were very clear reasons why the representatives of UNPROFOR for Bosnia and Herzegovina responded more to claim that ‘ ‘It may never be known who has actually fired a deadly grenade …’ ‘, and that the precision is hit by the “accidental happiness of anyone who was shooting,” or that the shelling investigations were “insufficient at this stage.” Radovan Karadzic knew appreciate this kind of indecision, and, as a guest in the Special Emission of Serbian Radio Television, stated: “We are satisfied with the United Nations, with whom we arrange all these jobs.” (AIZ, DVD no. 31, Serbian-Radio Television, Studio Sarajevo, Special Emission, Editor: Risto Đogo, February 1994).
Conclusions on the guilt, almost 10 years after the crime, Galić was also given to Galić, by the conception of how the branch of the market, “outside of any reasonable doubt, was intentionally fired from the SRK control,” which was confirmed in judgments Prosecution vs. Karadzic and Mladic. In these verdicts, there is “clear evidence according to whom 7. Battalion 1. Romania Infantry Brigade SRK had 120 mm mortars in Mrković, which is northeast of Markal.”
UN re-avoided concrete action
But unclear and unsaid reactions of the United Nations officials “of both parties for the crime”, perfectly fit into the political and military context of that time, and responded to the current state of UNPROFOR for the field. Thanks to “unidentification” of the culprit for the crime on Markals, the United Nations was re-avoided, and, by the apparent withdrawal of heavy weapons or its inspection of UNPROFOR, a very quick break and after a short break and Shelling by civilian goals in the city.
Attitudes of the Trial and Appeals Chamber ICTY in the Stanislav Galić case, Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic about the positions “Srk” as a place of firing, should serve for the end of manipulations about this crime. However, theses by suspects for this crime, part of the Political leadership of the Republika Srpska, as well as their lobbyists in the world, that the massacre was cut, are still present.
Despite the amendments to the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina, relating to the possibility of sanctioning the final convicted war criminals, the denial of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, still there are no sanctions for non-determinant judgments that are, when it comes to Crimes on Markals, imposed in front of international courts (ICTY and IRMCT).
(Vijesti.ba)
